Oral Communication Blog
ORAL COMMUNICATION BLOG
Oral
communication skills are important to literacy development and are essential
for thinking and learning. Talk helps students communicate information and
explore ideas, solve problems, and clarify their thoughts. Listening and
speaking are essential for social interaction. Ontario Ministry Expectations
for Language Curriculum (p.80) has the following overall expectations for Oral
Communication:
1. Students will listen in order to understand
and respond appropriately in a variety of situations for a variety of purposes
2. Students
will use speaking skills and strategies appropriately to communicate with
different audiences for a variety of purposes
3. Students
will reflect on and identify their strengths as listeners and speakers, areas
for improvement, and the strategies they found most helpful in oral
communication situations
The curriculum overview stresses the importance
of “real, purposeful talk” in order “to construct meaning and communicate
successfully” and “that it needs to be threaded throughout every day and across
the curriculum to promote the transfer of language knowledge, skills and,
strategies to learning across the curriculum” (p.76). As a teacher, it is
important that learners have the opportunity to ask questions, share their
thinking to develop their understanding. In most classrooms teachers make
opportunities to develop oral communication through class discussions and
activities such as, speeches. Another way of sharing ideas and developing talk
or discourse is through Knowledge Building Circles. The Ministry Monograph
(2011), Grand Conversations in the Junior
Classroom, describes Knowledge Inquiry Circles as a “venue” that can be
used in junior classrooms.
In
Natural Curiosity, Knowledge Building
Discourse, which is also called Knowledge Building Circles, is described as, “a
communal activity in which learners come together to pose questions, posit
theories, and to revisit, negotiate, and refine their ideas” (2011, p.11).
Class discussions has been a component of classrooms for a very long time as a
way of developing understanding through sharing different points of views. This
is different than the usual class discussions as students sit in a circle to
share their ideas. The Knowledge Building Circle is similar to the Indigenous Talking
Circle, in which individuals take turns sharing their ideas. The circle is
intentional as it encourages attentive listening and communication; and all
students have an equal place in the discussions. The Learning Exchange has a
number of videoclips that show educators what a Knowledge Building Circle can
look like in the classroom. This videoclip is a grade 5 class: https://thelearningexchange.ca/videos/knowledge-building-circle/
| Retrieved from https://thelearningexchange.ca/videos/knowledge-building-circle/ |
It would seem that if an educator uses
Knowledge Building Circles on a regular basis, the learners become very
comfortable with listening to one another and being able to share their
learning. Some of the scaffolds that the educator can use to help the students
go beyond information sharing:
I
wonder…… , An improved idea is ……, Another way of looking at it…..(p.25)
The Knowledge Building Circles also
provides the teacher with assessment information using observations and
conversations.
Knowledge
Building Discourse “serves to identify shared problems and gaps in
understanding in understanding beyond the level of the most knowledgeable
individual” (Scardamalia, 2002, p.12). Knowledge Building Circles are a way of
working out students’ questions and ideas, rather than teacher asking questions
and some student answering. The questions turn into further wonderings for the learners
to research. Some of the learning opportunities of using Knowledge Circles
is:
·
building on the knowledge that the student
has shared with the class
·
making connections that might lead to idea
improvement by the whole class
·
contributing to students’ understanding
about the content (Chiarotto, 2011, p.12)
Knowledge Building Circles is one of the
structures for Knowledge Building, an approach to student inquiry in the
classroom.
In the videoclip, one of the teachers says
that Discourse and Collaboration is at the centre of Knowledge Building. It is
this developing of communication skills in learners that enables them to really
engage in 21st century learning. This is also clearly demonstrated
in the chart below:
Table 2: The Unique Role of Knowledge Building Discourse
in Inquiry-based Learning
|
Discourse, rather
than content delivery, shapes the direction and manner of learning.
|
|
The teacher does not
necessarily know in advance all of the questions and answers that may emerge
from student discourse.
|
|
The teacher nurtures
student engagement by asking open-ended questions such as: “Did anyone notice/read/ find out
something that might help us understand our question?”
|
|
Students attempt to
reconcile their own theories and ideas in light of new sources of
information. Teachers support them in this process by asking questions such
as: “How does
that information support your theory? Have you changed or added to your
theory?”
|
|
The teacher models
and facilitates multi-directional dialogue to help students internalize and
practise it themselves. “Does anyone have something to build onto Joseph’s idea? Joseph,
please pass-on to another student.”
|
Retrieved on
November 21, 2017. Retrieved from www.naturalcuriosity.ca/pdf/NaturalCuriosityManual.pdf
The use of
Knowledge Building Circles is definitely one of the structures that I would
like to use in my classroom, as a means of having learners participate in real
and purposeful talk in an authentic manner.
References:
Ontario Ministry of Education.
(2011). Capacity Building Series. Grand
Conversations in Junior Classroom.
Ontario Ministry of Education.
(2006). The Ontario curriculum, Grades 1–8: Language. Toronto: Queen’s Printer
for Ontario.
Scardamalia,
M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of
knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal
Education in a Knowledge Society (pp.67-98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
Comments
Post a Comment